California Needs an Investment Crowdfunding Law. Here’s our Proposal

Posted · Add Comment

PageLines-CrowdfundingInCA_notext.jpg

 

By Christina Oatfield – (Sustainable Economies Law Center)

Summary of the Local Economies Securities Act (SB577)

Existing Securities Law

The laws regulating investment offerings in the US are called ‘securities law.’ When an investment offer, sale, or advertisement is made, that is, when a “securities offering” is made, it must generally either be permitted by a government agency or it must fall under an exemption from permitting requirements. Many Slow Money style investment offerings are often exempt from federal registration because they are contained entirely within one state, or they involve small amounts of money.

However, California’s state permitting process required for public advertising of investment opportunities is a barrier for Slow Money style local investing campaigns. A permit from the California regulators entails a fee of $500 to $2,500, plus weeks or months of waiting for regulators to respond to applications. Most businesses embarking on a public investment offering hire an attorney to help with the process for around $10,000 to $30,000.

The California Local Economies Securities Act (SB 577, Hueso)

The California Local Economies Securities Act will exempt certain securities offerings from California permit requirements, with special provisions for small farms, agricultural land trusts, and renewable energy cooperatives. In particular, this bill proposes to allow enterprises to conduct small public offerings through the following exemptions from permitting:

Small Investments

  • Any business could raise up to $500,000 total per year.
  • Non-accredited investors could invest up to $1000 in the offering.
  • Accredited investors could invest up to 5% of their net worth.

Farms and Agricultural Land Trusts

  • A farm enterprise or agricultural land trust could raise up to $2 million total per year for the purchase, long-term leasing, or improvement of real property to be used for agriculture purposes. 75% of the funds raised must be used for these purposes.
  • Funds raised for land purchases must be held in an escrow account until the enterprise raising funds has entered into a contract to purchase the land.
  • Each individual investor could invest up to $1,000 at least.
  • An investor could invest up to $5,000 IF the investor has an annual gross income of at least $100,000 or a total net worth of $200,000 or more.
  • Accredited investors could invest up to 5% of their net worth.

Renewable Energy Projects

  • Nonprofits, cooperatives, and some other enterprises could raise up to $2 million total to finance the purchase of solar panels or wind turbines, and related equipment.
  • The same limits per investor that are in the farmland exemption would apply.

YOUR HELP is needed! This bill will not pass unless lawmakers in Sacramento hear from supporters who care about community investing! There are ways you can help. You can:

  • Write a letter to your Senator in Sacramento
  • Call your Senator in Sacramento
  • Set up a meeting with your Senator or staff in their district offices
  • Tell your friends, family, and colleagues about local investing and why this bill matters

Find template support letters, resources for finding your Senator’s contact information, a detailed FAQ about the bill, and more at theselc.org/LESA


 

Why the proposed Local Economies Securities Act is more community-friendly than the recent JOBS Acts crowdfunding rules

A Perspective by the Sustainable Economies Law Center

As you may recall, there was much excitement in 2012 after President Obama signed the JOBS Act into law. This excitement was around Title III, also known as the Crowdfunding Title, which created certain exemptions from the requirement to obtain a permit from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) before starting an investment crowdfunding campaign. No entrepreneur has been able to make use of the law, however, because we have been waiting for the SEC to promulgate rules, as required by the law passed by Congress. The SEC fell behind schedule and took until last Friday, October 30, 2015, to finalize the rules it was required to make per the JOBS Act. The rules are set to go into effect on January 29, 2016.1

The Sustainable Economies Law Center (SELC) has been asked about what the imminent implementation of the Crowdfunding Title of the federal JOBS Act means for state-level crowdfunding laws and pending legislation, which many states have adopted or considered largely in response to the SEC’s tardiness. At the Sustainable Economies Law Center, we think the answer depends on the state, since the details of state-level crowdfunding laws and pending legislation around the nation vary greatly. Although SELC was among the early advocates who got momentum going for the federal crowdfunding legislation, they think there are some great innovations in the state-level investment crowdfunding laws that have since passed, some of which may better serve community-based businesses.

While some states copied provisions of the federal crowdfunding laws, meaning rules and restrictions are the same (but apply to just one state, of course), other states adopted crowdfunding laws that allow each investor to invest as much as $10,000, including non-accredited investors – an amount that exceeds limits per investor found in the federal law. Federal law limits investments per investor to as little as $2,000, depending on the investor’s income or net worth. Another example is Oregon’s “Community Public Offering” rules, which allow each investor to invest up to $2,500, regardless of the investor’s income or net worth. Oregon’s approach saves entrepreneurs and investors from the hassle of collecting and sharing information about each investor’s income or net worth, which some advocates of that law have said is a great advantage for entrepreneurs who do not have much time or money to handle lots of paperwork.

The choice to raise capital under the federal crowdfunding law or under a state-level crowdfunding law, which would generally still require compliance with other federal securities law provisions, will depend on a variety of factors, including the nature of the enterprise, the pool of potential investors, and the geographical location of potential investors. Complying with the federal crowdfunding law allows an entrepreneur to accept investments from all over the nation, without worrying about complying with the laws of multiple states, so this may be a huge advantage for some enterprises that are seeking a national or large regional market. For other enterprises that are more place-based, this difference might be trivial, and it might make more sense to raise capital under the state-level crowdfunding laws in those states, if available.

SELC has been a sponsor of pending legislation in California called the Local Economies Securities Act, or SB 577, introduced earlier this year by Senator Ben Hueso. They think this bill, if passed into law, would be more advantages than the federal JOBS Act for many enterprises, especially beginning farmers seeking to access farmland, agricultural land trusts, and place-based solar and wind energy enterprises. These are among the types of enterprises that the bill was designed for, but we think other types of enterprises might find it more advantageous as well.

Before going into more detail about California’s Local Economies Securities Act, let’s first review the Crowdfunding Title III of the JOBS Act for some context.

Summary of the JOBS Act – the Federal Crowdfunding Law:

A securities offering is exempt from registration under the federal crowdfunding law where the total amount of securities sold during any 12 month period does not exceed $1 million. Individual investors are limited as follows:

  • If the investor’s net worth is below $100,000, then they can invest up to $2,000 or up to 5% of their net worth, whichever is greater.
  • If the investor’s net worth is above $100,000, then they can invest up to 10% of the investor’s annual income or net worth, whichever is lesser, and no more than $100,000.2

Additionally, issuers (“issuer” is the term that securities laws use to refer to an enterprise selling securities in its own business, but not a third party broker selling stock or other securities) must use a regulated, web-based “funding portal” to communicate about the offering to prospective investors. The web platforms will be regulated and will be required to take some steps to ensure that offerings are compliant with the law, but operators of these web platforms will be prohibited from making investment recommendations or offering investment advice to users of the platform.3 Furthermore, among other requirements, the business raising money must have its financial statements reviewed if raising more than $100,000, or audited if raising more than $500,000.4

(There are many other restrictions and requirements in the JOBS Act that are not covered in this post and this information should not be relied upon as legal advice.)

JOBS Act Severely Limits Advertising and Communication

There are some requirements and restrictions in the JOBS Act that are cause for concern, especially for community-rooted enterprises. At SELC, our greatest reservation about the new federal law is that “offerings must be conducted exclusively through a platform operated by a registered broker or a funding portal”5 which will limit the use of various communication methods that entrepreneurs and investors alike may prefer to use to discuss the offering.

More specifically, the SEC’s newly set rules about advertising state that “An issuer may not, directly or indirectly, advertise the terms of an offering made” except for statements that direct investors to the intermediary’s platform and include “no more than” the following: 1) a “statement that the issuer is conducting an offering,” 2) the “terms of the offering,” and 3) “[f]actual information about the legal identity and business location of the issuer, limited to the name of the issuer of the security, the address, phone number and website of the issuer, the e-mail address of a representative of the issuer and a brief description of the business of the issuer.”6

This means that an entrepreneur will only be able to communicate extremely limited information about their securities offering through in-person conversations, emails, flyers, or presentations and other events, among other more personal forms of communication. They may use those other communication methods to alert potential investors that the entrepreneur has a securities offering open to the public and that one can learn more about it by visiting a certain URL, but not much additional information is allowed. For example, an entrepreneur telling a story about what motivated them to start their business, or other personal background information regarding their knowledge and experience is not among the information that is allowed in advertising. This eliminates opportunities for the kind of personalized communication that fosters meaningful relationships between entrepreneurs and investors – something SELC believes will hold back both entrepreneurs and investors alike.

SELC believes that personal relationships are vital for both entrepreneurs and investors to build trust in one another that will lead to successful investments and successful businesses. In some cases, personal communication between an entrepreneur and an investor might lead an investor to decide that the investment opportunity is not the right fit, and it might lead the investor to decide not to invest. In those cases, personal communication actually protects investors from making investments that are not in the investor’s best interest or are not aligned with the investor’s values. For this reason SELC believes that any state-level crowdfunding law that allows more direct, personal, and varied communication between entrepreneurs and investors will ultimately provide the biggest advantage for both the businesses raising funds and for the investors’ protection.

Furthermore, SELC also believes that this very limited scope rule on advertising is unrealistic for many entrepreneurs to follow. The Sustainable Economies Law Center works with many entrepreneurs, knowing that the ones who have the intense passion that is typically necessary to start a successful business or organization are often so passionate about their work that it’s very difficult to avoid talking about it, especially during a fundraising campaign.

SELC’s California Local Economies Securities Act, SB 577:

SELC is sponsoring legislation in the California State Legislature that we are very excited about because we think it will better open doors to raising capital for a variety of enterprises necessary to the economic and ecological health of California, including small farms, agricultural land trusts, cooperatives, locally-controlled renewable energy organizations, and other small businesses. The bill is divided into three distinct exemptions from permitting requirements: one for any small business raising up to $500,000, one for farmland purchases and other beginning farm expenses up to $2 million, and one for place-based wind and solar energy systems up to $2 million. In the various exemptions, each investor would be limited to investing up to $1,000, up to $5,000, or up to 5% of net worth per enterprise per year, depending on the investor’s income and wealth, as described in the bill. Each exemption contains investor protections such as a set of disclosure documents with a stern warning to investors required as the cover sheet, among other investor protections. You can read more about the bill and how to express your support here.

 

1SEC Release NO. 33-9974, October 29, 2015, page 1

2SEC Regulation Crowdfunding § 227.100(a)

3See generally the US JOBS Act of 2012, Title III, Sections 302 and 304

4US JOBS Act of 2012, Title III, Section 302, 4A (b)(1)(D)

5SEC Release NO. 33-9974, October 29, 2015, page 13

6SEC Regulation Crowdfunding § 227.204